Domain Claw
Live agent
Send me a keyword, competitor, or domain shortlist. I will narrow it with WHOIS, suffix coverage, and traffic evidence.
Domain Claw · Research companion
A name is a starting point. Evidence makes it a shortlist.
Domain Claw is the QName AI agent for conversational domain research. Describe your product, audience, or candidates to narrow a naming direction. The conversation combines naming suggestions, WHOIS checks, suffix comparisons, and available traffic evidence from QName AI. Build a shortlist you can investigate and explain, keeping creative ideas separate from checked facts.
Give Domain Claw a useful brief
- 01
Describe the product and the audience
Tell Domain Claw what your product does, who uses it, and the target market. Include language, suffix preferences, and naming style. Invented names, descriptive domains, and familiar phrases solve different problems. An invented name can leave room for expansion; a descriptive phrase may make the current use case easier to recognize. Explain which tradeoff matters: pronunciation, meaning, length, or room to expand. Avoid sharing confidential material unnecessary for naming.
- 02
Turn preferences into candidates
Ask Domain Claw for a focused direction before a long list. Explain words to avoid, competitors, and any established brand to match. Compare suffix variants and refine candidates, but remember that fluent suggestions do not prove availability. Evidence is bounded; keep shortlists manageable and divide larger lists into follow-up requests.
- 03
Review the returned evidence
Ask Domain Claw to check WHOIS for concrete candidates. Compare returned registration status, dates, registrar, age, and available traffic. Research status distinguishes complete, partial, and unavailable evidence. Missing fields remain unknown, not favorable scores. If a source fails, retry those candidates later and preserve returned facts; incomplete answers are not final recommendations.
- 04
Make the final checks yourself
Take the shortlist to your registrar to confirm current availability, registration price, renewal cost, and any purchase conditions. Review the name for brand confusion and check relevant trademark records before adopting it. Consider the domain’s historical use and whether the spelling works in speech, email, and your target language. Domain Claw supports research, not registration, name reservation, legal clearance, or guaranteed commercial performance.
Domain Claw example: a research tool for founders
I am building a keyword research tool for English-speaking founders. I want a clear, easy-to-say name that can expand beyond SEO. Compare descriptive and invented naming directions, then check the concrete candidates you return.
This example prompt gives Domain Claw an audience, task, language, and reason to avoid narrow names. It is not a domain recommendation. Look for a coherent direction and evidence for each candidate. If reasoning relies on missing registration or traffic fields, ask for that point to be marked unknown. Confident wording cannot replace evidence.
Follow up with: “Keep the shortest two candidates, explain pronunciation tradeoffs, and identify missing registration facts.” Or: “Compare preferred suffixes, separating checked status from naming opinion.” Return to your brief: memorable names can still be misheard, confused with other brands, or disconnected from your product. Ask customers to spell each candidate after hearing it. Record your decision and evidence date together.
Understand Domain Claw evidence
- WHOIS and registration records
- Domain Claw uses the QName AI domain API for WHOIS evidence. Returned fields can include registration status, registrar, creation or expiry dates, and domain age. Coverage varies across domains and registries, and privacy protection can limit ownership information. A lookup is a point-in-time observation. Registration dates alone do not establish historical website quality, and an available status can change before you reach checkout.
- Traffic evidence
- Traffic figures are evidence from the source returned by QName AI, not access to a domain owner’s private analytics. Check the period and source supplied with the result. Missing traffic is not zero traffic, and a reported estimate does not prove that visitors will remain after a domain purchase. Use it as one input alongside brand fit, relevant audience, and historical use.
- AI naming judgment
- Naming explanations and rankings are judgments generated from your brief and available evidence. They are useful for comparing tradeoffs, not guarantees of business success. Ask Domain Claw why a candidate fits and which facts support that judgment. A recommendation should stay open to revision when new registration information, brand conflicts, or audience feedback changes the picture.
Public guide, signed-in conversation
This guide and the example workflow are readable without an account. Sending a message to Domain Claw requires signing in. Start with a focused request, wait for the research stages, and review partial evidence if an upstream service is delayed. A message can contain up to 4,000 characters. The conversation is for domain research; service availability and evidence coverage can affect the response. A retry cannot guarantee that an unavailable source will return data.
Use keyword research to investigate how people describe the problem, or inspect WHOIS directly for an existing candidate. Move from ideas to checked shortlists without asking the agent to infer verifiable facts. Recheck important domain information before purchase and retain the registrar’s final terms with your notes.